JOSEPH S. NYE
CAMBRIDGE – For years, political leaders such equally old U.S.A. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta receive got warned of the danger of a “cyber Pearl Harbor.” We receive got known for some fourth dimension that potential adversaries receive got installed malicious software inward our electricity grid. Suddenly the powerfulness could become out inward large regions, causing economical disruption, havoc, as well as death. Russian Federation used such an ready on inward Dec 2015 inward its hybrid warfare against Ukraine, though for alone a few hours. Earlier, inward 2008, Russian Federation used cyber attacks to disrupt the regime of Georgia’s efforts to defend against Russian troops. Thus far, however, cyber weapons seem to hold upwardly to a greater extent than useful for signaling or sowing confusion than for physical devastation – to a greater extent than a back upwardly weapon than a agency to clinch victory. Millions of intrusions into other countries’ networks occur each year, but alone a half-dozen or so receive got done important physical (as opposed to economical as well as political) damage. As Robert Schmidle, Michael Sulmeyer, as well as Ben Buchanan put it, “No i has e'er been killed yesteryear a cyber capability.”
US doctrine is to response to a cyber ready on alongside whatever weapon, inward proportion to the physical impairment caused, based on the insistence that international police line – including the correct to self-defense – applies to cyber conflicts. Given that the lights receive got non gone out, maybe this deterrent posture has worked.
Then again, maybe nosotros are looking inward the incorrect place, as well as the existent danger is non major physical impairment but conflict inward the grayness zone of hostility below the threshold of conventional warfare. In 2013, Russian main of the full general staff Valery Gerasimov described a doctrine for hybrid warfare that blends conventional weapons, economical coercion, information operations, as well as cyber attacks.
The occupation of information to confuse as well as dissever an enemy was widely proficient during the Cold War. What is novel is non the basic model, but the high speed as well as depression terms of spreading disinformation. Electrons are faster, cheaper, safer, as well as to a greater extent than deniable than spies carrying around bags of coin as well as secrets.
If Russian President Vladimir Putin sees his province equally locked inward a care alongside the U.S.A. but is deterred from using high levels of strength yesteryear the gamble of nuclear war, so perchance cyber is the “perfect weapon.” That is the championship of an of import novel book yesteryear New York Times reporter David Sanger, who argues that beyond beingness “used to undermine to a greater extent than than banks, databases, as well as electrical grids,” cyberattacks “can hold upwardly used to fray the civic threads that grip together republic itself.”
Russia’s cyber interference inward the 2016 American presidential election was innovative. Not alone did Russian intelligence agencies hack into the electronic mail of the Democratic National Committee as well as dribble out the results through Wikileaks as well as other outlets to shape the American tidings agenda; they equally good used US-based social-media platforms to spread fake tidings as well as galvanize opposing groups of Americans. Hacking is illegal, but using social media to sow confusion is not. The brilliance of the Russian conception inward information warfare was to combine existing technologies alongside a score of deniability that remained but below the threshold of overt attack.
US intelligence agencies alerted President Barack Obama of the Russian tactics, as well as he warned Putin of adverse consequences when the 2 met inward September 2016. But Obama was reluctant to telephone phone out Russian Federation publicly or to receive got strong actions for fright that Russian Federation would escalate yesteryear attacking election mechanism or voting rolls as well as jeopardize the expected victory of Hillary Clinton. After the election, Obama went world as well as expelled Russian spies as well as closed some diplomatic facilities, but the weakness of the U.S.A. response undercut whatever deterrent effect. And because President Donald Trump has treated the number equally a political challenge to the legitimacy of his victory, his management equally good failed to receive got strong steps.
Countering this novel weapon requires a strategy to organize a broad national response that includes all regime agencies as well as emphasizes to a greater extent than effective deterrence. Punishment tin hold upwardly meted out inside the cyber domain yesteryear tailored reprisals, as well as across domains yesteryear applying stronger economical as well as personal sanctions. We equally good postulate deterrence yesteryear denial – making the attacker’s move to a greater extent than costly than the value of the benefits to hold upwardly reaped.
There are many ways to brand the U.S.A. a tougher as well as to a greater extent than resilient target. Steps include preparation province as well as local election officials; requiring a newspaper trail equally a back-up to electronic voting machines; encouraging campaigns as well as parties to ameliorate basic cyber hygiene such equally encryption as well as two-factor authentication; working alongside companies to exclude social media bots; requiring identification of the sources of political advertisements (as immediately occurs on television); outlawing unusual political advertising; promoting independent fact-checking; as well as improving the public’s media literacy. Such measures helped to boundary the success of Russian intervention inward the 2017 French presidential election.
Diplomacy powerfulness equally good play a role. Even when the U.S.A. as well as the Soviet Union were bitter ideological enemies during the Cold War, they were able to negotiate agreements. Given the authoritarian nature of the Russian political system, it could hold upwardly meaningless to concord non to interfere inward Russian elections. Nonetheless, it powerfulness hold upwardly possible to flora rules that boundary the intensity as well as frequency of information attacks. During the Cold War, the 2 sides did non kill each other’s spies, as well as the Incidents at Sea Agreement express the flat of harassment involved inward unopen naval surveillance. Today, such agreements seem unlikely, but they are worth exploring inward the future.
Above all, the U.S.A. must demonstrate that cyber attacks as well as manipulation of social media volition incur costs as well as thence non rest the perfect weapon for warfare below the flat of armed conflict.
Joseph S. Nye, Jr., a old U.S.A. assistant secretarial assistant of defence strength as well as chairman of the U.S.A. National Intelligence Council, is University Professor at Harvard University. He is the writer of Is the American Century Over?
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
