If I were Trump, here's what I'd do.
Call together the most supportive Republicans, along with the leadership of the Senate. Let them know what your most urgent priorities are; brand them a share of getting these things done. If they have got their ain pet projects, they tin give the sack submit them inward writing at a afterward time. You'll regard them individually.
Lay downwardly the constabulary - the entire squad has to stick together - no "side deals" with the Democrats, period.
No meetings that are non official business, or STRICTLY social. No to a greater extent than talking to them behind the party's dorsum - they volition evidence to co-opt anyone they can.
When they verbalize nearly bipartisanship, listen, in addition to reply, "Great! What are y'all prepared to give up?" Make no promises, but concord to convey their offering dorsum to the leadership.
No definite compromises, no bargain - don't fifty-fifty bother the other guys with that.
If in that place is anyone on your staff who is halfway inward the steal of the other party, living with them, socializing with them, or related to them - allow them go. Don't become far ugly, post them off with dainty recommendations, severance, whatever.
But, instruct rid of them. I don't tending how gifted they are at their assigned duties. Job ONE is loyalty.
As far equally immigration for the adjacent few years. Probably the most of import affair whatever of us tin give the sack produce is to article of apparel downwardly those non agreement the province of affairs (the majority, who back upwards immigration primarily on humanitarian grounds). This is best done, 1 fact at a time.
Memes tin give the sack come upwards inward handy here. They don't endeavor to scrap ALL the facts; they only focus on giving 1 tiny fleck of information, preferably with a moving-picture demo that hits people emotionally.
Or, a graph, with a link to to a greater extent than information, similar the 1 at the link.
You desire them to focus on ONE thing, such equally this take-away:
Call together the most supportive Republicans, along with the leadership of the Senate. Let them know what your most urgent priorities are; brand them a share of getting these things done. If they have got their ain pet projects, they tin give the sack submit them inward writing at a afterward time. You'll regard them individually.
Lay downwardly the constabulary - the entire squad has to stick together - no "side deals" with the Democrats, period.
No meetings that are non official business, or STRICTLY social. No to a greater extent than talking to them behind the party's dorsum - they volition evidence to co-opt anyone they can.
When they verbalize nearly bipartisanship, listen, in addition to reply, "Great! What are y'all prepared to give up?" Make no promises, but concord to convey their offering dorsum to the leadership.
No definite compromises, no bargain - don't fifty-fifty bother the other guys with that.
If in that place is anyone on your staff who is halfway inward the steal of the other party, living with them, socializing with them, or related to them - allow them go. Don't become far ugly, post them off with dainty recommendations, severance, whatever.
But, instruct rid of them. I don't tending how gifted they are at their assigned duties. Job ONE is loyalty.
As far equally immigration for the adjacent few years. Probably the most of import affair whatever of us tin give the sack produce is to article of apparel downwardly those non agreement the province of affairs (the majority, who back upwards immigration primarily on humanitarian grounds). This is best done, 1 fact at a time.
Memes tin give the sack come upwards inward handy here. They don't endeavor to scrap ALL the facts; they only focus on giving 1 tiny fleck of information, preferably with a moving-picture demo that hits people emotionally.
Or, a graph, with a link to to a greater extent than information, similar the 1 at the link.
You desire them to focus on ONE thing, such equally this take-away:
The Atlantic has even then or then other article bemoaning the "fact" that the Republican Party - peculiarly those that back upwards Trump, equally ignorant hicks.
Oh, that's non precisely what he says - he refers to it equally "The Education Divide", but that's clearly what he means. He cites statistics:
Hmmm. The "past 6 decades"? I wonder what could have got caused that switch? Let's retrieve nearly it:According to exit polls, 61 per centum of non-college-educated white voters cast their ballots for Republicans piece only 45 per centum of college-educated white voters did so. Meanwhile 53 per centum of college-educated white voters cast their votes for Democrats compared with 37 per centum of those without a degree.The diploma divide, equally it’s oft called, is non occurring across the electorate; it is primarily a phenomenon alongside white voters. It’s an unprecedented divide, in addition to is inward fact a consummate divergence from the diploma dissever of the past. Non-college-educated white voters used to solidly belong to Democrats, in addition to college-educated white voters to Republicans. Several events over the past times 6 decades have got caused these allegiances to switch, the most recent beingness the candidacy, election, in addition to presidency of Donald Trump.
Sixty years agone would last roughly 1960. Richard Nixon was the GOP candidate, Kennedy the Dem one. Let's facial expression upwards it, many of today's Democratic voters became imprinted on Kennedy, rather similar ducklings produce on their mother. They personally identified with the manner in addition to apparent intellectualism of the Kennedys in addition to their followers.
I write "apparent", because it's pretty clear that Kennedy was non much of a thinker. He had considerable charisma, in addition to an mightiness to deliver speeches that was unparalleled, until Reagan showed up. His Pulitzer-winning book, Profiles inward Courage, has been admitted to have got been written past times Sorensen.
Mike Wallace interviewed Drew Pearson, in addition to the even out hitting the news. ABC apologized, but Wallace never backed off.
The authorship was clarified inward Sorensen's autobiography,
In May 2008, Sorensen clarified inward his autobiography, Counselor, how he collaborated with Kennedy on the book: "While inward Washington, I received from Florida almost daily instructions in addition to requests past times alphabetic lineament in addition to telephone – books to send, memoranda to draft, sources to check, materials to assemble, in addition to Dictaphone drafts or revisions of early on chapters." (Sorensen, p. 146) Sorensen wrote that Kennedy "worked peculiarly difficult in addition to long on the root in addition to final chapters, setting the note in addition to philosophy of the book" in addition to that "I did a root draft of most chapters" in addition to "helped remove the words of many of its sentences". JFK "publicly acknowledged inward his introduction to the bulk my extensive purpose inward its composition" (p. 147) Sorensen claimed that inward May 1957, Kennedy "unexpectedly in addition to generously offered, in addition to I happily accepted, a amount to last spread over several years, that I regarded equally to a greater extent than than fair" for his operate on the book. Indeed, this supported a long-standing recognition of the collaborative sweat that Kennedy in addition to Sorensen had developed since 1953.But, WAIT! Yet or then other ghostwriter may have got contributed to the book. That person, a professor, has a alphabetic lineament from JFK to dorsum upwards his assertion of having written at to the lowest degree a share of the bulk that got JFK a Pulitzer.
Why is this of import today?
Because then much of the supposed intellectual association with the Democratic Party, in addition to its politicians, derives from this fraud. Many of the Democratic Elite business office similar Kennedys - their attendance at an Elite school, that Daddums paid for, is taken to last evidence of their superior brainpower.
What is NOT mentioned inward the Atlantic article is what form of bird a college graduate held. Women are notorious nearly selecting majors that don't necessitate advanced math skills - the Liberal Arts, in addition to "Studies" majors are predominantly woman someone enrollment.
Men attention college are to a greater extent than probable to written report the difficult sciences, engineering, or describe organisation (particularly accounting, economics, in addition to finance). The bird of rigor inward those courses is higher past times a broad margin.
What is too non shown inward that written report is college written report non ending inward a bird - those that attended, but dropped out. Many successful people have got non completed their degrees - Bill Gates is only 1 example.
For today's graduates, attendance inward college has piddling human relationship to intellectual curiosity or academic skills.
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
