Russian agents used Facebook to influence the 2017 election. Congress missed the risk to delve into what the company's CEO Mark Zuckerberg knows close it—and how he'll halt it inwards 2018. OVER THE LAST ii days, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was questioned for to a greater extent than than 10 hours past times ii unlike Congressional committees. There was granular focus on privacy definitions in addition to information collection, in addition to quick footwork past times Zuckerberg—backed past times a phalanx of lawyers, consultants, in addition to coaches—to arts and crafts a narrative that users “control” their data. (They don’t.) But the gaping hole at the see of both hearings was the virtual absence of questions on the tactics in addition to role of Russian information operations conducted against Americans on Facebook during the 2016 elections. Here are the 5 of the biggest questions close Russian Federation that Zuckerberg wasn’t asked or didn’t answer—and why it’s of import for Facebook to render clear information on these issues.
1. What were the tools in addition to tactics used past times Russian entities to execute information operations against American citizens, in addition to what were the narratives pursued?
In both hearings, inwards answering unrelated questions, Zuckerberg began to delineate “large networks of faux accounts" established past times Russian entities. In both instances, he was cutting off. This was a meaning missed chance to push clit dorsum the drape on the mechanisms of Russian information operations against the American public.
The vast bulk of information made available past times Facebook—and the focus of questions inwards response—have been close ads in addition to promoted content from Russian entities similar the Internet Research Agency. In fact, this was non the primary agency of distributing content, collecting information, identifying potential supporters, in addition to promoting narratives. The original tool for this was faux accounts posting "native" content—plain old Facebook posts—building relationships alongside existent users.
In Wednesday’s hearing before the House Energy & Commerce Committee, for example, Zuckerberg said that tens of thousands of faux accounts were taken downwards to foreclose interference inwards elections inwards 2017, implying that this was to a greater extent than oft than non relating to Russia. But this wholesale removal of accounts plainly went way beyond the 740 accounts that receive got been identified equally buying ads on behalf of the IRA. Zuckerberg focused only on ads bought past times Russian accounts, non the regular Facebook posts that were thence much to a greater extent than numerous. He testified that the Russian accounts were primarily using “issues ads”—aimed at influencing people’s views on issues rather than promoting specific candidates or political messaging. Asked close the content though, Zuckerberg said he had no specific knowledge.
In the indictment of the IRA, prosecutors highlighted the fact that the agency had used mistaken IDs to verify mistaken personas. So, piece Facebook's annunciation that grouping pages volition straightaway require verification alongside a authorities ID in addition to a physical address that tin last validated, faux IDs in addition to the usage of US-registered crunch corporations (a indicate raised past times Senator Sheldon Whitehouse) tin last used to bypass these safety protocols—albeit alongside a much to a greater extent than meaning expenditure of resources.
Zuckerberg said Facebook only identified Russian information operations existence conducted on their platform correct before the 2016 elections. But inwards his written testimony, he says they saw in addition to addressed activeness relating to Russian intelligence agencies earlier. And from 2014 onward, Facebook was made aware of the aggressive information campaigns existence run against Ukraine past times Russia.
It wasn't an accident that Zuckerberg used the term "sophisticated adversaries" inwards his prepared statement. Facebook, to a greater extent than than anyone, has visibility into what Russian Federation does in addition to why it works. Apparently, no 1 was interested inwards hearing what he had to say.
2. What personal information does Facebook brand available to the Russian nation media monitoring agency Roskomnadzor or other Russian agencies? Is this only from accounts located inwards or operated from Russia, or does this include Facebook's global data?
These questions were asked past times old fighter airplane pilot in addition to Russia-hawk Rep. Adam Kinzinger—and answered evasively past times Zuckerberg, who did non address the fact that the Russian authorities requires companies similar Facebook to store their data inwards Russian Federation exactly thence they tin access it (and that the Russians say that Facebook has agreed to comply). Very few companies—including Twitter in addition to YouTube—have provided much transparency on what information they portion alongside the Russian government. This is of import because, depending on the scale, Russian Federation doesn't demand to rely on information harvesters if they tin just larn it themselves. In some other instance, a corporate partnership was formed alongside Uber to forcefulness information sharing.
This is also of import because Zuckerberg expressed extreme skepticism close sharing information alongside the US government. Does he experience the same way close unusual entities? When constabulary enforcement or intelligence agencies from to a greater extent than aggressive unusual governments inquire for information, does Facebook comply? Is at that spot whatever instance where they receive got complied alongside a unusual authorities asking that they would deny the United States?
In both hearings, Zuckerberg was also asked if Russian Federation or China scrape Facebook data, or used apps similar the 1 used past times Aleksandr Kogan, the information scientist who provided Facebook information to Cambridge Analytica. Zuckerberg responded that he didn’t receive got specific cognition of that—but, equally Rep. January Schakowsky pointed out, at that spot were nine 1 1000 m apps scraping data, thence how tin they maybe get down to know where the information in addition to all its derivative copies went?
Zuckerberg called Chinese meshwork companies a “strategic in addition to technological threat”—and whoever asked the inquiry just moved on. This is a huge admission from 1 of the people best positioned to empathize how AI in addition to information tech tin last weaponized past times adversaries. Next time, maybe allow the homo verbalize close what he sees in addition to the threats nosotros are upwards against?
3. Did Facebook delete information related to Russian information operations conducted against American citizens? Will it concord to brand this cloth available for researchers?
In the House hearing, at that spot was 1 inquiry relating to information preservation inwards connectedness to the Cambridge Analytica case. But non a unmarried fellow member asked if Facebook has preserved all of the information in addition to content connected to Russian information operations conducted against American citizens, or whether that information in addition to content would last made available to researchers or intelligence agencies for evaluation.
Many accounts receive got been pulled downwards in addition to deleted, in addition to piece some of the advertising clients receive got been exposed, many of the faux accounts in addition to mistaken identities are non known to the public. It is vital that this information last analyzed past times people who empathize what the Russians were trying to reach thence nosotros tin evaluate how to bound computational propaganda from hostile entities in addition to assess the affect these operations had on our population. Without this sort of analysis, nosotros volition never unravel the harm or construct realistic defenses against these capabilities.
Zuckerberg got no questions close mitigating the psychological affect of these operations. There were no questions to close Facebook’s ain internal enquiry in addition to evaluation of these tools in addition to tactics. And no 1 asked what Facebook knows close their broader effectiveness or affect on the public.
4. What assistance produce Facebook employees embedded alongside advertising clients provide? Did whatever Facebook employees render back upwards to the Internet Research Agency or whatever other employment organisation or agency inwards Russian Federation targeting content to American citizens?
Facebook dodged a major bullet because this entire line of questioning was left unexplored. There was 1 inquiry close Facebook employees embedded inwards 2016 political campaigns; largely Zuckerberg answered sideways. But at that spot are extremely of import questions to last raised close the way inwards which Facebook employees aided in addition to enabled harvesters of information in addition to the targeting of hostile information operations—not only against the American public, but inwards other countries equally well.
If Facebook employees worked alongside the Russians to define to a greater extent than effective audience targeting, for example, thence they had vastly to a greater extent than cognition than they acknowledge in addition to are vastly to a greater extent than complicit. The same would last truthful if Facebook embeds were working alongside 3rd parties similar Cambridge Analytica in addition to other companies that assist governments in addition to ruling parties target their oppositions in addition to win elections. For example, Cambridge Analytica/SCL’s operate inwards Africa shows how aggressively Facebook was used inwards elections. Did Facebook know? Were they involved? Do their employees receive got straight cognition of or assist “black PR” in addition to coercive psychological operations?
5. Does Facebook receive got copies of information uploaded to "custom audiences" past times whatever Russian entity?
In many ways, the information volition last the fingerprints of the investigations of the Russian operations inwards the 2016 elections. As business office of Facebook's “custom audiences” feature, y'all tin upload datasets to target Facebook users. If at that spot is overlapping targeting information or instances inwards which similar information was used past times unlike advertising clients, y'all tin exhibit potential coordination betwixt carve upwards entities—for example, maybe the IRA in addition to the NRA, or the nighttime coin PACs running ads against Clinton. Does Facebook receive got whatever known Russian datasets from 2016 that could last compared to Cambridge Analytica in addition to or Trump create data?
Senator Amy Klobuchar highlighted the fact that 126 1 1000 m people saw IRA content in addition to asked if these people overlapped alongside the 87 1 1000 m who had their information scraped past times Cambridge. Zuckerberg said it was “entirely possible” that they overlapped. If this tin last documented, it would come inwards probable that the Cambridge Analytica information was used past times the Russians in addition to past times the Trump campaign—and this would hateful coordination betwixt the ii entities. The inquiry thence would last who knew close the shared data?
AMERICAN PRIVACY IS important. But gaining a to a greater extent than expansive agreement of the information operations existence targeted against our population past times hostile unusual actors similar Russian Federation is also critical. In that respect, the Zuckerberg hearings were a huge missed opportunity. We produce non receive got a lot of fourth dimension to assess in addition to evaluate what happened inwards 2016 before the 2018 elections are upon us. This is non simply a cybersecurity challenge; it’s non just close protecting voting machines or e-mail servers. There is an information element that is non existence addressed, in addition to doing thence gets harder when companies similar Facebook are erasing in addition to suppressing the information that tin assist us move to a greater extent than informed in addition to assist us prepare a novel sort of human-led deterrence that volition foreclose these campaigns from existence equally effective inwards the future.
Zuckerberg repeatedly referred to the thought of information “control” that was completely nonsensical to anybody who genuinely speaks English linguistic communication equally a kickoff language. We don't command our data. Especially non when Facebook is aggressively harvesting information on everyone, non just their 2 billion users, in addition to edifice meshwork access globally thence they tin larn fifty-fifty to a greater extent than data. It doesn’t affair that Facebook isn’t “selling data”—an oft-repeated theme. They are using psychographics to profile y'all in addition to selling advertisers access to the products of those algorithms. This is why at that spot was evasion on questions close predictive profiling—the entire backend of adtech. Facebook knows it works. They usage it every day—and they empathize exactly how effective it tin last for hostile actors similar Russia.
Mr. Zuck Goes to Washington
Congress asked Mark Zuckerberg unproblematic questions, because no 1 genuinely understands how Facebook works
During his ii days of testimony, Mark Zuckerberg repeatedly misrepresented how much command users genuinely have over their privacy
Molly K. McKew (@MollyMcKew) is an proficient on information warfare in addition to the narrative architect at New Media Frontier. She advised Georgian President from 2009-2013 in addition to old Moldovan Prime Minister Vlad Filat inwards 2014-15.
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
