‘FaceBook Is Why We Need Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 — Digital Protection Agency — It’s Not Just The Cambridge Analytica Debacle, Ethics Don’t Scale,’ One Technologist Argues Paul Ford posted a characteristic article, March 21, 2018, alongside the championship inward a higher identify to Bloomberg.com. Mr. Ford is a writer, figurer programmer, together with co-founder of Postlight, a digital production studio based inward New York that specializes inward mobile, together with spider web development. Mr. Ford begins, “Over together with over the concluding twenty years, we’ve watched low-cost, or gratis Internet communications platforms jump from the goodness intentions, or social curiosity of tech folks. We’ve watched every bit these platforms expanded inward might together with significance, selling their influence to advertisers. Twitter, FaceBook, LinkedIn, Google they grew hence fast. One day, they are a lovable novel way to come across modest pix, side past times side affair you lot know — they’re re-configuring democracy, governance, together with business,” he wrote.
“FaceBook’s recent debacle is illustrative,” Mr. Ford asserts. “It turns out the fellowship permit a researcher spider through its social network to assemble information on fifty meg people. Then, the Britain information analysis firm, Cambridge Analytica used that information to target probable Trump voters. FaceBook responded that, no, this was non a “breach.”
“Okay, sure, let’s non telephone call upwardly it a breach,” Mr. Ford wrote. “It’s how things were designed to work. That’s the problem,” Mr. Ford contends.
“For years, we’ve been talking together with thinking nearly social networks every bit interesting tools to model together with empathize human dynamics,” Mr. Ford wrote. “But, it’s no longer academic — FaceBook has reached a scale where its non a model of social club every bit much every bit an engine of culture. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 researcher gained legitimate access to the platform, together with hence just….kept going, together with Cambridge Analytica ended upwardly alongside those fifty meg profiles. The “hack” was a truthful judo motion to role the rattling nature of the platform against itself — similar you lot gave MacGyver a telephone book; and, he somehow made it into a bomb.”
“What’s been unfolding for a spell now,” Mr. Ford observes, “is a rolling catastrophe hence obvious, nosotros forget it’s happening. Private information is spilling out of banks, credit-rating providers, electronic mail providers, together with social networks — and, ending upwardly everywhere. So, this is an era of breaches together with violations, together with stolen identities,” he contends. “Big companies tin react nimbly, when they fright rule is truly on the horizon — for example, Google, FaceBook, together with Twitter guide keep agreed to part information alongside researchers who are tracking disinformation, the final result of a European Commission on imitation news. But, for the most part, we’re dealing alongside global entities that ain the way whereby politicians garner votes, guide keep vast access to upper-case alphabetic character to fund lobbying efforts, together with are constitutionally certainly of their ain moral cause. That their ain platforms are used for awful ends, is merely a side consequence on the way to global transparency, together with shame on us for non seeing that.”
“So, are nosotros doomed to permit them accept our data, or that of our loved ones, together with hence to scout every bit that same information is used against us or shared past times hackers?,” Mr. Ford asks. The answer he wrote is….“Yes frankly. We’re doomed. Equifax Inc. certainly won’t salve us. Do nosotros trust Congress to convey change? Do nosotros trust Congress to plug inward a telephone charger?, he asks. “I’ll live overjoyed to reveal out I am wrong,” he adds. In the meantime, plough on two-factor authentication everywhere (ideally using a hardware dongle similar a YubiKey) invest inward a password manager, together with guide keep on tight.”
“The give-and-take “leak” is right,” Mr. Ford wrote. “Our feel of command over our ain destinies is existence challenged past times these leaks. Giant Internet platforms are poisoning the commons. They’ve automated it. Take a non-FaceBook case: YouTube,” Mr. Ford explained. “it has users who honey conspiracy videos; and, YouTube takes that honey every bit a sign that to a greater extent than together with to a greater extent than people would honey those videos too. Love all around! In February, an ex-employee tweeted: “The algorithm I worked on at Google recommended [Info Wars personality together with lunatic conspiracy-theory purveyor] Alex Jones’ videos to a greater extent than than 15,000,000,000 times, to about of the most vulnerable people inward the nation.”
“The caput of Youube, Susan Wojcicki, lately told a crowd at SXSW [South By Southwest Conference Festival] that YouTube would kickoff posting Wikipedia’s explanatory text side past times side to conspiracy videos (like those calling a teen who survived the Parkland, Fla. shooting, a “crisis-actor”). Google, manifestly didn’t state Wikipedia nearly this plan,” Mr. Ford wrote.
“The activist, together with Internet entrepreneur, Maciej Ceglowski ane time described large information every bit “a bunch of radioactive, toxic sludge that nosotros don’t know how to handle,” Mr. Ford noted. Maybe nosotros should call upwardly nearly Google together with FaceBook every bit the novel polluters. They’re imperative is to grow! They do jobs! They pay taxes, class of ! In the meantime, they’re dumping trillions of units of toxic encephalon toxicant into our public-thinking reservoir. Then, they mop it upwardly alongside Wikipedia, or ship out a message that reads, “We accept your privacy seriously.”
Which brings Mr. Ford to suggest “the creation of a digital Environmental Protection Agency. Call it….the Digital Protection Agency. Its project would live to build clean upwardly toxic information spills, educate the public, together with calibrate together with levy fines.”
Then, Mr. Ford goes on to explicate about of the specifics of his proposal; and, about of the responsibilities this entity would have; and, I refer you lot to Mr. Ford’s article inward Bloomberg for additional details.
I do non know what the answer is to this problem; but, every fiber inward my existence would resist the creation of a authorities agency to oversee together with ‘clean-up’ our digital mess. Yes, it is messy, together with at times tin live terribly inconvenient. But, nosotros demand to ensure nosotros do non brand the occupation worse past times having a agency of the Federal Government, or Congress oversee its digital fallout. Private entities, together with individual enterprise volition live a much improve arbiter of serious digital spills together with digital theft. Necessity is the woman raise of invention. And, I suspect, that nosotros volition before long come across companies inward the Internet infinite commence to advertise their expertise together with abilities to mitigate the harm from unintended information spills and/or, digital theft.
But, at that spot is niggling doubt, that social media, together with our Internet giants guide keep a problem. Cyber safety guru Bruce Schneier, wrote on his blog, schneieronsecurity.com, Feb 14, 2018, that, “in most cases, its impossible for consumers to brand informed decisions nearly whether their information is protected. We guide keep no view what sorts of safety measures Google uses to protect our highly intimate spider web search information or, our personal emails. We guide keep no view what sorts of safety measures FaceBook uses to protect our posts, together with our conversations.
“Think nearly all the companies [Internet-based together with otherwise] collecting personal information nearly you lot [us], the websites nosotros visit, our smartphone together with its apps, our Internet-connected car [and home] — and, how niggling nosotros know nearly their safety practices ” Mr. Schneier wrote. How well, or not, do they protect our data? Do they ‘sell’ our personal information to others? How well, or not, do these minute together with tertiary tier Internet/web provider companies adhere to the same safety standards every bit the large players’? What incentives are inward identify to encourage best cyber hygiene practices? And, what disincentives or punitive measures are available together with enforced — when these same companies neglect to adhere to these standards? “Even worse,” Mr. Schneier wrote, “credit bureaus together with information brokers similar Equifax, collect our personal information — without our noesis or consent.”
“Government policy is the missing ingredient,” Mr. Schneier wrote. “We demand standards [for personal information protection]; and, a method for enforcement. We demand liabilities, together with the might to sue companies that poorly secure [and administer/oversee] our data. The biggest ground companies do non protect our personal [online] information is….it’s cheaper non to,” Mr. Schneier observes. Government policy is how nosotros modify that,” he concludes.
Maybe. But, I promise at that spot is a lot to a greater extent than thoughtful debate earlier nosotros do about other bureaucratic/government entity to address a occupation that may live best handled past times the individual sector. It would look cyber safety insurance is ane avenue of approach. Having to pay out hefty sums of cash for violating the price of cyber insurance may live ane avenue of approach.
Even alongside the best cyber hygiene practices, together with the creation of a ‘digital protection agency,’ at that spot are no silver, cyber bullets out there. The Internet together with Worldwide Web were built on a foundation for ease of use. Security was an afterthought, or straight off high plenty a priority at the Internet’s creation. Indeed, had the sort of safety been implemented at the front-end that would guide keep been required hence nosotros wouldn’t reveal ourselves inward this province of affairs — it is highly probable nosotros would non guide keep seen the sort of prosperity together with character of life enhancements that the Internet has brought us. These sort of measures on the front end destination may guide keep doomed this magnificent creation — to the dustbin of digital oblivion. So, nosotros guide keep a grand Internet that is built on a bad foundation. Regardless of implementing the highest digital standards of protection — the darker digital angles of our nature volition always…find a way in. Whether that is through a trusted insider, or, about other elegant collection technique, ane tin never assume that your information is totally secure. There is no such thing. That doesn’t hateful nosotros should non role the FaceBook debacle to advance the thinking nearly the best courses of activeness to pursue that would address perchance 80-85 percentage of the problem. We can’t permit the perfect…..be the enemy of the goodness enough. RCP, fortunascorner.com
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
