Many of these cover their Communist/Socialist/Leftist origins/backing from their members. They carefully couch their aims inwards price that Christians use, oft deliberately citing the Bible IN PART, to convey to a greater extent than people to hand them money/pressure ICE too the Feds to dorsum down.
What they DON'T produce is to hand the total story. For example, inwards most of the stories nearly Samuel Oliver-Bruno, he is portrayed every bit a manly somebody bring upward who lived hither for roughly unspecified time, went to United Mexican U.S.A. to tend his sick father, too alone crossed the edge to attention for his sick wife.
That's the bare information available. What is NOT written:
What they DON'T produce is to hand the total story. For example, inwards most of the stories nearly Samuel Oliver-Bruno, he is portrayed every bit a manly somebody bring upward who lived hither for roughly unspecified time, went to United Mexican U.S.A. to tend his sick father, too alone crossed the edge to attention for his sick wife.
That's the bare information available. What is NOT written:
- Just precisely how did Bruno cash inwards one's chips her inwards the starting fourth dimension place?
- Does he cause got criminal associations/background inwards Mexico?
- Just when did he go out to attention for his father? Just who is his father?
- While he was here, did he role falsified/stolen documents to work?
- Did he financially back upward his kids?
- Did his married adult woman neglect to cite his presence inwards this country, too collect welfare/food stamps/benefits every bit a unmarried mom?
- Did he file income tax? Pay into Social Security?
- Is his manly somebody bring upward alive/still sick/dead? When did whatever of this happen?
- Was Bruno employed inwards Mexico? How did he survive?
- Did Bruno commit other crimes than illegally crossing the edge - fifty-fifty if the arrests weren't followed upward on?
- Any DUIs inwards that history?
- If he drove a car, did he comport insurance?
These, too other questions, are only the minimum that should live asked.
And, nearly that flick - the 1 that ALL the intelligence media were posting on their forepart pages?
The woman, amongst 2 of her v children, says that she is from Honduras. She claims to live traveling to bring together her husband. I presume that he is illegally inwards this country, every bit in that location seems to live no other argue for exposing his theatre unit of measurement to danger.
Here's the even out from the lensman who took the picture (he did non talk Spanish, thus was non able to confirm whatever of the even out that he was told past times others).
David Harris thinks this was a posed faux picture - too he shows a larger persuasion taken at the same time.
The bigger effect - why did the adult woman non acquaint herself at an diplomatic mission before inwards the trip, or cause got Mexico's offering of asylum?
Answer - she is non escaping Republic of Honduras inwards fearfulness of her life. She, similar her husband, is an economical "refugee". Not eligible for asylum.
UPDATE: Rush agrees amongst me - this is staged.
UPDATE: Rush agrees amongst me - this is staged.
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
