He said.
She said.
No resolution, except inwards the minds of those who crave slow answers.
More than ane pundit has suggester parallels amongst the Salem Witch Trials.
Are nosotros inwards danger of entering a New Puritan Era? It's non equally crazy equally you lot mightiness intend - Andrea Dworkin's piece of job was strongly anti-sex.
Cartoonists as well as Progressives seem to hold upward competing to generate the lowest, most vile slogans/cartoons/comments. Apparently, this was triggered past times the Kavanaugh fille who said that she would pray for Daddy's accuser. Naturally, the 'wit' decided to plough that into a cartoon that targeted Kavanaugh through his daughter.
I constitute this post service tardily inwards the afternoon - the explanation makes equally much sense equally anything else I've seen - more, inwards fact.
UPDATE:
I was watching this video most trunk linguistic communication from Gateway Pundit, as well as I had ane of those Sudden Insights:
I pointed out to her that she needed to speak amongst that mortal the side past times side day, focusing on FEELING words (I empathise how you lot feel, it doesn't seem equally though your piece of job or circumstances are valued, etc.). In other words, I told her - speak similar a woman, non a man.
She is not, as well as never has been, a man. But, similar me, she has worked inwards environments that were to a greater extent than manful mortal - sometimes considerably - than female. She is a teacher, precisely a scientific discipline teacher. She served inwards the military. That makes a difference, as well as it is inwards her powerfulness to "speak bilingually" - both manful mortal as well as woman mortal styles.
Most elementary/middle schoolhouse teachers piece of job inwards the woman mortal mode, whether or non they convey that trunk type. They are focused on feeling, emotion, as well as connections that bypass the logical thinking process. When confronted amongst a province of affairs similar the Ford/Kavanaugh testimony, they revert to their preferred agency of emotional empathy.
Translation? Don't hold off the investigation to alter anything, whether or non Ford's even out is completely exposed, or not. It volition non thing to those women (and, emotional men). What counts is how they FEEL most Ford.
For these women, what counts is that they tin flame position a fourth dimension inwards their life, when something similar to what she describes happened to them. They say, "I was telling the truth, hence SHE is telling the truth."
Not logical, precisely - that's the point.
When argument earlier juries, a lawyer has to brand an EMOTIONAL connection, non a logical case.
She said.
No resolution, except inwards the minds of those who crave slow answers.
More than ane pundit has suggester parallels amongst the Salem Witch Trials.
Are nosotros inwards danger of entering a New Puritan Era? It's non equally crazy equally you lot mightiness intend - Andrea Dworkin's piece of job was strongly anti-sex.
Cartoonists as well as Progressives seem to hold upward competing to generate the lowest, most vile slogans/cartoons/comments. Apparently, this was triggered past times the Kavanaugh fille who said that she would pray for Daddy's accuser. Naturally, the 'wit' decided to plough that into a cartoon that targeted Kavanaugh through his daughter.
I constitute this post service tardily inwards the afternoon - the explanation makes equally much sense equally anything else I've seen - more, inwards fact.
UPDATE:
I was watching this video most trunk linguistic communication from Gateway Pundit, as well as I had ane of those Sudden Insights:
This accusation is beingness assessed real differently past times the Kavanaugh side as well as the Ford side (including the other accusers).
The Kavanaugh side is using logic, breaking downwards each lie, evasion, gap, or contradiction. Collectively, it forms a illustration for Kavanaugh, based on available noesis of the facts.
The Ford side is using emotion, looking at Ford's as well as Kavanaugh's testimony holistically, as well as ignoring the specifics.Essentially, it's a Male Thinking vs. Female Thinking situation. My fille as well as I were talking most this yesterday - she had been inwards a coming together amongst a colleague, as well as attempted to refute that person's electrical load amongst a logical response.
I pointed out to her that she needed to speak amongst that mortal the side past times side day, focusing on FEELING words (I empathise how you lot feel, it doesn't seem equally though your piece of job or circumstances are valued, etc.). In other words, I told her - speak similar a woman, non a man.
She is not, as well as never has been, a man. But, similar me, she has worked inwards environments that were to a greater extent than manful mortal - sometimes considerably - than female. She is a teacher, precisely a scientific discipline teacher. She served inwards the military. That makes a difference, as well as it is inwards her powerfulness to "speak bilingually" - both manful mortal as well as woman mortal styles.
Most elementary/middle schoolhouse teachers piece of job inwards the woman mortal mode, whether or non they convey that trunk type. They are focused on feeling, emotion, as well as connections that bypass the logical thinking process. When confronted amongst a province of affairs similar the Ford/Kavanaugh testimony, they revert to their preferred agency of emotional empathy.
Translation? Don't hold off the investigation to alter anything, whether or non Ford's even out is completely exposed, or not. It volition non thing to those women (and, emotional men). What counts is how they FEEL most Ford.
For these women, what counts is that they tin flame position a fourth dimension inwards their life, when something similar to what she describes happened to them. They say, "I was telling the truth, hence SHE is telling the truth."
Not logical, precisely - that's the point.
When argument earlier juries, a lawyer has to brand an EMOTIONAL connection, non a logical case.
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
