By PAUL MCLEARY
FARNBOROUGH AIR SHOW Despite a serial of high-profile hacks targeting U.S. of A. defense strength contractors, the Pentagon yet doesn’t receive got a workable conception to convince companies they piece of job with to harden their cyber defenses. “Because of a duet of recent events, nosotros realized that that is non proficient enough,” Kevin Fahey, the assistant secretarial assistant of defense strength for acquisition, told reporters here. Fahey said Mon afternoon that companies ofttimes self-report on whether they run across federal contracting regulations. Given the constant attacks on defense strength contractors from nation too non-state hackers, the Pentagon is looking for ways to clamp down. “We receive got to educate a means that nosotros evaluate people’s capability inwards cybersecurity,” from the start, Fahey said. There is verbalise of making cyber hygiene component of the contracting procedure too including it every bit a deciding constituent inwards awarding contracts but similar cost, schedule, too performance.
“The exclusively means you lot instruct far serious to manufacture is you lot instruct far component of the competition,” Fahey said. “We know it’s actually serious directly that nosotros require to brand that every bit a priority.”
Fahey briefed amongst Eric Chewning, deputy assistant secretarial assistant for Manufacturing too Industrial Base Policy. Chewning said that the regime likewise may send Red Team exercises to examination novel parches too assess vulnerabilities.
While at that spot has been some movement, at that spot is yet a really long means to instruct earlier whatsoever existent programs too rules are inwards place. Deputy Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan warned companies inwards Feb that they require to accept network safety to a greater extent than seriously, or potentially lose business.
In June, Kari Bingen, the Pentagon’s deputy secretarial assistant for intelligence, testified at the House Armed Services Committee that “we must institute safety every bit a 4th pillar inwards defense strength acquisition,” spell making safety “a major constituent inwards competitiveness for U.S. regime business.”
The plan, dubbed “Deliver Uncompromised,” is looking for ways the Pentagon tin piece of job with the defense strength manufacture on a illustration past times illustration dry reason to toughen safety too caput off threats, adding safety too counterintelligence assets “to augment our collection too analysis capabilities, gain a to a greater extent than comprehensive agreement to threats against our technologies.”
Raytheon’s next-generation, multi-function radars volition simultaneously detect, track, define, communicate, analyze too more.
The annunciation came days afterward reports emerged that Cathay had hacked into a U.S. defense strength contractor, stealing classified information most undersea warfare technologies, including plans to educate a supersonic anti-ship missile for usage on U.S. submarines past times 2020.
Ideas most incorporating cybersecurity inwards acquisition decisions too policy formation volition endure component of the much-anticipated Defense Industrial Base report, which the Pentagon hoped to receive got been made world past times Farnborough. But the study continues to bounce around the White House, where it has been since April, an official told me.
Tomorrow’s mission-critical decisions volition rely on multi-domain C2. Today, Raytheon is integrating the best defense strength systems with the best commercial technologies to instruct far possible.
Industrial base of operations principal Chewning, who headed upward the drafting of the industrial base of operations report, said that inwards the past, “our industrial policy essentially was our acquisition policy. It was what nosotros bought too how nosotros bought it,” Chewning said, “what I’d similar to endure able to produce is exit inwards front end of that too intend about, how produce nosotros assist inform acquisition policy with an industrial policy inwards back upward of our modernization objectives.”
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
