Coal as well as railways inwards Republic of Republic of India are heavily interdependent. In the Financial Year (FY) 2017, out of 574 MT of coal (inclusive of imports) consumed for grid electricity generation (Central Electricity Authority, 2017), 341 MT, or lx per cent, was transported through railways (Railway Board, March 2017). On average railways accounts for over 85 per cent of costs for transporting coal to thermal ability plants, every bit a number of ability plants are pithead/near coal mines as well as produce non role this fashion for transportation. Coal is 44 per cent of IR’s freight revenues as well as has an fifty-fifty higher portion inwards its profits. Indian Railway’s (IR) concern model is based on passengers underpaying as well as freight overpaying.
Revenues from freight carried incorporate a combination of the next 3 components: tonnes carried, distance carried (whose production becomes tonne-kilometres or TKm), as well as toll charged (Rupees/TKm). IR’s average distance of coal transported (called “lead”) to thermal ability plants (TPPs) has fallen thirty per cent inwards the yesteryear v years which impacts revenues. This has happened mainly due to a onetime endeavour towards coal linkage rationalisation as well as too due to falling ability found charge factors (PLFs). On the contrary, to maintain total revenue, IR coal freight charges bring grown to a greater extent than than 4 times the wholesale inflation charge per unit of measurement during FY 2012 to FY 2017.
Despite higher rider volumes on a shared network, Republic of Republic of India has the lowest fare-to-freight ratio—the ratio of rider fares as well as freight charges—of 0.24, compared alongside several other countries including Nihon (1.9), Federal Republic of Federal Republic of Germany (1.5) as well as PRC (1.2). This witting policy alternative to maintain rider fares depression results inwards freight overpaying its share.
India has the lowest fare-to-freight ratio (0.24) compared alongside several other countries including Nihon (1.9), Federal Republic of Federal Republic of Germany (1.5) as well as PRC (1.2).
Railways today explicitly over-prices coal freight yesteryear close 31 per cent to outset its “social obligation” or coaching losses. In FY 2017, this “overcharge” from coal to TPPs ( Rs. 108 billion or Rs. 10,800 crores) increases the cost of power, on an average, yesteryear close 10 paisa per kWh on the dry reason of all electricity generated inwards India. For coal carried yesteryear railways, on average, this number is Rs. 0.21/kWh inwards FY 2017. For ability plants inwards distant states, which inherently rely on railways for coal, this number tin hold out 3 times higher.
A Brookings Republic of Republic of India bottom-up coal need model for FY 2030 forecasts a slower growth inwards total coal requirement inwards the province than the past, driven yesteryear a combination of falling electricity growth rates, improved ability found efficiencies (especially the advent of super-critical coal ability plants), as well as the ascent of renewable unloosen energy (RE). This number is worsened yesteryear the projected slowdown inwards railway traffic growth for coal. While coal need continues to grow through FY 2030 inwards absolute terms, its growth charge per unit of measurement declines.
IR may fare worse every bit what matters to a greater extent than for railways is the place of coal demand. Not only volition growing RE give the axe coal generation but the portion of RE volition disproportionately grow inwards states alongside high solar as well as current of air resources – coincidently those far from coal mines. For distant locations, the ascent of high-voltage DC (HVDC) technologies has meant it tin hold out cheaper as well as to a greater extent than efficient to send ability over the wire than carry coal yesteryear railways. The economic science are farther skewed due to coal cross-subsidising passengers.
For distant locations, the ascent of high-voltage DC (HVDC) technologies has meant it tin hold out cheaper as well as to a greater extent than efficient to send ability over wire than carry coal yesteryear railways.
Planned capacity of coal ability plants is generally either pithead/near coal mines or coastal, compared to at i time when capacity is relatively distributed across the country. Coastal plants are designed for imported coal, which, although expensive per tonne, is nonetheless cheaper afterward adding transportation costs as well as levies.
Projections as well as modelling for the time to come propose that to maintain railways solvent based only on the cross-subsidy model would outcome inwards a freight ascent that would brand coal (and thence thermal electricity) uncompetitive.
If rider fares increment at a compounded annual growth charge per unit of measurement (CAGR) of 4.5 per cent (same every bit historical FY 2006-17) as well as railways continues to overcharge freight to recover rider losses pro rata, inwards FY 2030 the average “overpayment” per kWh volition increment to eighteen paisa per kWh inwards existent terms on the dry reason of all electricity generated, compared to 10 paise per kWh inwards FY 2017. Naturally, the costs would hold out far higher inwards nominal terms, as well as too higher inwards distant locations.Download total report
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
