Source Link
And when did he mean value it?
In his ain words:
For the interested, a careful exam volition give away that the increasingly abstract give-and-take surfaces a procedure of reaching across many perspectives; pulling each together with every 1 apart (analysis), all the piece intuitively looking for those parts of the disassembled perspectives which naturally interconnect amongst 1 roughly other to degree a higher-order, to a greater extent than full general elaboration (synthesis) of what is taking place. As a result, the procedure non solely creates the Discourse but it also represents the cardinal to evolve the tactics, strategies, goals, unifying themes, etc., that permit us to actively sort together with conform to the unfolding globe nosotros are a utilization of, alive in, together with feed upon. Abstract (c. 1987)
I took a stab at illustrating Boyd’s process:
The bubbles inward the arrows exhibit roughly of “perspectives” he pulled apart. The boxes along the bottom correspond his syntheses, the presentations that brand upward his Discourse on Winning together with Losing.
I was involved at the 2 ends, “Destruction together with Creation” (1976) on the left together with the 2 boxes — Conceptual Spiral (1992) together with The Essence of Winning together with Losing (1996) — on the far right.
It turns out that 1 of Boyd’s closest associates, Chuck Spinney, also drew a catamenia nautical chart depicting how his concepts developed. Chuck was intimately involved amongst all the boxes on the chart:
This isn’t inward strict chronological lodge (neither is mine), but inward price of how the ideas came to maturity, I concord completely.
Both of these illustrate the procedure of many-side, implicit cross-referencing across a diverseness of domains. The balance of Boyd’s concept of Orientation, “projection, empathy, correlation, together with rejection,” unremarkably involved telephone calls belatedly into the night. Coram’s majority describes this really well.
Incidentally, Chuck noted that early on, “ODA” stood for “Orientation, Decision, Action” which John came upward amongst during his fourth dimension running Development Planning on the Air Staff at the Pentagon. Later, he added “Observation.”
All of the presentations together with papers mentioned here, amongst the exception of the Aerial Attack Study together with Boyd’s master copy Energy-Maneuverability (E-M) papers (which would hold out of involvement solely to historians of air-air scrap together with are summarized inward New Conception) are available from the Articles page.
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
