Among European elites, at that topographic point is even so substantial back upwards for a strategic partnership with Turkey – albeit non for advancing the beleaguered accession process. Europe needs to uncovering novel channels through which to engage with Ankara. Since Turkey shows no immediate wishing to restore the dominion of police describe or a reform process, for the fourth dimension existence European Union fellow member states can, at best, strive to engage inwards transactional bilateral relations with Turkey, every bit an effective partnership with the ground is critical to their interests. Ankara as well as the Council of Europe should piece of employment together to address issues such every bit human rights, the dominion of law, as well as political freedoms inwards Turkey – exterior of the European Union accession procedure but inwards line with the Copenhagen Criteria. The European Union should update its customs matrimony with Turkey, non to the lowest degree because merchandise betwixt the 2 sidess has to a greater extent than ofttimes than non benefited pro-European Turkish businesses as well as civil company groups. The European Union as well as Turkey should found a framework for addressing disputes that involve the Turkish diaspora inwards Europe, patch coordinating their policies on conflicts inwards the Middle East.
INTRODUCTION
Addressing a press conference inwards Paris inwards Jan 2018, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan complained that years of waiting for membership of the European Union was “seriously exhausting us as well as seriously exhausting our nation. Maybe this [situation] volition forcefulness us to convey a decision.” French President Emmanuel Macron replied, “for relations with the European Union, it is clear that recent developments as well as choices allow no progress.” He continued, “We must instruct out of a hypocrisy that consists inwards thinking that a natural progression towards opening novel chapters is possible. It’s non true.”
Journalists as well as officials receive got quietly used the tidings “hypocrisy” to depict Turkey’s planned accession to the European Union since 2010, when the procedure came to a halt with the sides having opened solely xvi chapters of negotiations. But it is rare for a European leader to utilisation such linguistic communication inwards an official setting. When asked well-nigh Macron’s comments on his way dorsum from Paris, Erdoğan said, “I didn’t wishing to empathize what he said exactly. I focused on getting them to empathize us. I thought he should empathize what I am saying. I focused on explaining that every bit proficient [sic] every bit possible.” Taken together, Macron’s remarks as well as Erdoğan’s reaction are a microcosm of Turkey’s human relationship with the EU.
Today, 12 years after the start of the accession negotiations, xxx years after Turkey’s application for accession to the EU, as well as to a greater extent than than one-half a century after an association understanding with the European Economic Community, this human relationship is inwards a parlous state. At best, it is an practise inwards hypocrisy that industrial plant for both sides. At worst, it is a dialogue of the deaf that volition Pb to a deadening divorce.
Of course, things did non receive got to choke this way. Turkey’s membership bid was in ane lawsuit hailed every bit a major strategic chance for both sides. Now, many chapters of the accession negotiations are blocked as well as several European leaders receive got announced that at that topographic point is picayune prospect of European Union enlargement. The Turkey–EU human relationship suffers from periodic political crises involving, as well as diplomatic spats between, Ankara as well as diverse European governments. Initial enthusiasm has given way to rancour on both sides.
So, what tin live on preserved as well as achieved inwards the relationship? Should the sides hold the moribund accession procedure on the books or start discussing a novel framework? How volition Turkey as well as the European Union handle overwhelmingly negative world perceptions of each other patch elites struggle to prolong the status quo? In short, is at that topographic point value inwards hypocrisy when it comes to Turkey’s relations with Europe?
A PECULIAR STATUS QUO
The European Council on Foreign Relations’ novel survey of on perceptions of Turkey within 28 European Union fellow member states reveals the extent to which hypocrisy has choke a cardinal as well as almost functional aspect of the EU-Turkey relationship. Despite the problems facing the accession procedure as well as strong world opposition to Turkey’s membership across Europe, nearly all European governments believe – for widely varying reasons – that they should maintain, but non advance, the accession procedure inwards its electrical current state.
All fellow member states recognise that Turkey’s world icon inwards Europe has deteriorated inwards recent years, as well as that European Union citizens to a greater extent than ofttimes than non oppose Turkish accession. But, at the same time, European Union countries encounter Turkey every bit a major strategic ally, an of import (or potentially important) trading partner, as well as a powerfulness that should live on kept close.
Although European Union fellow member states as well as European decision-makers receive got picayune wishing to revive the accession process, many take in Turkey every bit a crucial partner. In the novel ECFR survey, 46 per centum of European Union decision-makers who responded to the questionnaire stated that their authorities “supports Turkey becoming a fellow member of the EU,” patch some other 25 per centum said that at that topographic point is “strong support” for Turkish membership within their governments. Only ane European Union fellow member province officially wants to suspend Turkey’s accession bid. Sixteen out of the 28 “want to hold frozen accession procedure every bit it is.”
Paradoxically, dysfunction as well as hypocrisy aid maintain the accession process. This is because countries that powerfulness quietly receive got questions well-nigh total Turkish membership of the EU, such every bit Poland as well as Cyprus, tin claim to back upwards the procedure rubber inwards the noesis that it volition rest stalled. Meanwhile, Turkey tin utilisation the powerfulness of hypocrisy to create a model for cooperation with the EU, preserving the status quo inwards the accession procedure with the back upwards of around lxx per centum of European Union decision-makers.
This is a considerable majority. Although Turkey has long focused on its disputes with the European Commission as well as European Union politicians, the most dedicated pro-Turkey advocates rest European Union elites – officials, diplomats, as well as decision-makers. Meanwhile, European Union citizens are far less tolerant of Turkey’s electrical current direction as well as its departure from European norms as well as values.
In wanting to hold Turkey close, European Union fellow member states receive got varying reasons but are primarily motivated yesteryear either fearfulness or greed. Those that strongly advocate maintaining the accession procedure do so out of either a sense of vulnerability, a strategic need, or the belief that Turkey is economically of import to Europe. For example, Greece, Cyprus, as well as Republic of Bulgaria believe that Turkey’s engagement with the accession procedure reduces the threat it poses to their national security, as well as that it provides them with some leverage over Turkey. Despite the strong anti-Muslim sentiment inwards parts of Polish society, Poland fears a strong Federal Republic of Federal Republic of Germany as well as would similar to receive got some other large histrion on the scene – thence its back upwards for the accession procedure continuing every bit it is. U.K. sees the possibility of a loose matrimony inwards full general – as well as favours enlarging the European Union over deepening relations betwixt its fellow member states. Rome, Madrid, as well as Paris are deeply interested inwards a realpolitik approach based on economical relations with Turkey given the country’s potential for growth. Small European Union countries such every bit Malta, Estonia, as well as Slovenia back upwards Turkey’s bid either because they wishing to receive got proficient relations with Ankara, receive got growing ties with the Turkish economy, or welcome some other province that would residuum the influence of the EU’s major players. Some fellow member states’ attachment to the dysfunctional status quo comes from fearfulness of existence engulfed inwards a large, strong Europe. Some believe that at that topographic point is a strategic instance for Turkey joining the European Union inwards the hereafter – but non necessarily now.
THE NEED TO DOWNPLAY ACCESSION TALKS
Most European countries would similar Turkey to rest inwards the limbo betwixt existence an insider as well as an outsider. It may good live on that, despite the hypocrisy as well as dysfunction, the status quo is Ankara’s most pregnant asset inwards preserving its human relationship with Europe during a turbulent era. Turkey has choke increasingly inward-looking as well as ever less democratic inwards the yesteryear few years, especially since the failed coup endeavour inwards July 2016. Despite this, EU-Turkey relations receive got remained intact. The European Commission as well as the European Council receive got dismissed calls from the European Parliament to suspend the accession talks. It is of import to save Turkey’s European membership bid for hereafter generations.
These trends propose that if Turkey reverses its drift towards authoritarianism, it may receive got a remove chances to revive its accession bid. Yet the status quo has created a sort of institutionalised hypocrisy, allows for no genuine motion towards integration, as well as marginalises the demand for Turkey to adopt the EU’s values every bit component division of its accession bid. As a consequence, the accession procedure has lost all credibility. Turkish bureaucrats who piece of employment on the European Union accession procedure ofttimes emphasise the fact that this province of limbo is non what Ankara wants but this is what it gets. The solely motion inwards the accession procedure inwards recent years involved a brief opening inwards EU-Turkey relations with the migration bargain the sides reached inwards Dec 2016. At the moment, the Turkish authorities shows no apparent wishing to render to a governance scheme centred on the dominion of police describe as well as displays picayune regard for the Copenhagen Criteria. And the European Union shows no indication of either reviving the accession procedure or pushing Turkey out.
Here are to a greater extent than examples of hypocrisy. Despite the widespread belief that Turkey is of import to the EU, solely 36 per centum of European Union decision-makers would similar to opened upwards novel chapters inwards the accession negotiations, patch 57 per centum of them would prefer to hold the procedure “frozen” inwards its electrical current state. There is a full general credence that Turkey’s world icon has deteriorated overall across fellow member states inwards the final few years, with some countries complaining well-nigh high-profile human rights cases involving their citizens – every bit seen with the Turkish authorities’ arrest of Die Weltreporter Deniz Yücel on terrorism charges, which caused an outcry inwards Germany. Nonetheless, 24 fellow member states believe that the European Union “should non live on whatever to a greater extent than outspoken on human rights as well as democracy” – solely 4 fellow member states create a instance for greater emphasis on human rights inwards Turkish-EU ties. European elites similar the thought of Turkey, every bit opposed to the reality; as well as they similar the notion of a strategic alliance with the country, but non necessarily every bit a fellow member of the club. Officials inwards 22 fellow member states assert that their governments believe Turkey to live on “a strategically of import partner as well as would create the European Union stronger”. Only ane fellow member province wants to formally destination the accession procedure as well as solely ane authorities officially holds the take in that the EU-Turkey human relationship should live on recast every bit a “privileged partnership”. Yet, inwards reality, the interrupted as well as dysfunctional procedure closely resembles the privileged partnership Turks receive got been rejecting all along due to its connotations of second-tier status.
A novel linguistic communication as well as a novel framework are needed to reconcile these apparent contradictions. Where they aim to prepare the Turkey-EU human relationship patch suspending (but non ending) the accession process, Turks as well as Europeans demand to speak non of “Turkish membership of the EU” but rather of “Turkey as well as Europe” every bit 2 historic, neighbouring powers. When the focus moves away from the accession process, it becomes relatively like shooting fish in a barrel for European Union fellow member states as well as citizens to recognise that an effective partnership with Turkey is critical to their interests. “Turkey-Europe” highlights a strategic need; “Turkey-EU” is all well-nigh Turkey’s shortcomings. H5N1 novel conceptual framing needs to refer Turkey’s historical as well as strategic ties to the continent as well as de-emphasise its shortcomings inwards the accession process. In the meantime, bilateral ties are the probable model for Turkey’s hereafter engagement with fellow member states.
ELITES VERSUS THE PUBLIC
Another of import reminder from ECFR’s novel Power Audit is that the human relationship with Turkey is an elite game. Turkish leaders inwards Ankara should empathize that the solely existent advocates for the human relationship are those that stand upwards for the establishment inwards Europe – that is, the collective of bureaucrats as well as politicians Turkish officials ofttimes fume at.
As this study confirms, the back upwards of European elites sustains the EU’s human relationship with Turkey. Leaders inwards Ankara should recognise this fact fifty-fifty every bit they launch verbal attacks on European Union bureaucrats as well as politicians.
Despite the apparent downturn inwards relations, the arguments inwards back upwards of Turkey’s membership bid within the establishment do non seem to receive got changed much inwards the yesteryear decade. According to ECFR’s novel survey, 79 per centum of European Union respondents (most of them officials) believe that their ground sees Turkey every bit a strategically of import partner that tin create the European Union stronger. That figure accounts for 22 of 28 fellow member states. Another 61 per centum believe that Turkey’s accession to the European Union would furnish their ground with novel economical opportunities. Coming at the lowest dot inwards EU-Turkey relations inwards recent times, these findings should hearten Ankara.
Of course, world take in is a different matter. Public sentiment well-nigh Turkey sharply diverges from the views of the establishment. According to ane survey taken inwards 2017, 84 per centum of Germans oppose Turkey’s membership of the EU.[1]In ECFR’s novel survey, solely seven per centum of respondents said that earth inwards their countries supports Turkey’s accession bid, 39 per centum viewed earth every bit indifferent to the issue, as well as the remaining bulk admitted that earth opposed Turkish membership of the EU. Almost lxx per centum of respondents noted that Turkey’s world icon has deteriorated inwards the yesteryear 2 years, producing greater pop opposition to Turkish accession. These findings dot that the EU’s debate on Turkey volition choke on to live on a affair of elites versus “the people” – or the establishment versus world opinion. European elites wishing a unopen human relationship with Ankara – as well as inwards many fellow member states focus on Turkey’s long-term strategic as well as economical value. But earth remains unconvinced. It is no coincidence that spikes inwards Turkish-European tension almost ever coincide with elections inwards Europe or Turkey. Turkey’s membership bid was a major topic during the Brexit referendum, every bit good every bit inwards the recent Dutch, Austrian, as well as High German elections. European leaders exhibit relatively picayune willingness to accommodate Ankara during an election, the fourth dimension at which they are most nether pressure level to cater to world opinion.
THE IMPORTANCE OF BILATERAL RELATIONS
In navigating this hard territory, peculiarly the widening gap betwixt elite views as well as world opinion, Turkish as well as European Union leaders require an approach to a greater extent than nuanced than elementary repetitions of back upwards for the status quo. The results of ECFR’s novel survey underline the demand to prepare a novel linguistic communication to depict the importance of EU-Turkey relations exterior the range of the accession process. Both sides demand to start framing the debate every bit “Turkey as well as Europe” – every bit opposed to “Turkey as well as the EU” – as well as to avoid linguistic communication that focuses on the fatigued enlargement process.
There is argue to downplay accession on both sides. Discussions on Turkey’s accession to the European Union to a greater extent than ofttimes than non emphasise the country’s weak points – its democratic deficit, the Republic of Cyprus issue, as well as its indifference to the dominion of law. The Turkish authorities resents what it regards every bit the “hierarchical” tone of the accession process, patch Europeans experience that Turkey’s progress is likewise slow. However, when the human relationship is to a greater extent than transactional as well as the tidings is “Turkey as well as Europe”, every bit 2 partners, at that topographic point is an inherent equality inwards the discourse that the Turkish authorities has wanted all along. Instead of framing every advance or setback inwards the human relationship every bit component division of the accession process, the sides tin piece of employment together every bit strategic partners as well as found the tone the Turkish authorities has asked for all along.
Such a transactional relationship, with a focus on bilateral ties, is maybe the solely realistic way to maintain EU–Turkey ties for the moment. Moving away from the accession focus would probable trim back tensions with the European Commission as well as aid European leaders accommodate world opinion, patch allowing for deeper bilateral engagement with Turkey on line organisation deals, unusual policy, as well as counter-terrorism. Indeed, yesteryear placing a strong emphasis on merchandise as well as counter-terrorism, Macron presented such a model during Erdoğan’s see to Paris inwards Jan 2018. (French officials fighting that bilateral engagement also allows them to heighten private human rights issues with their Turkish interlocutors – albeit with mixed success.)
When it comes to bilateral ties, most European nations seem happy to engage inwards some type of a give as well as convey with Ankara, fifty-fifty though their citizens sometimes criticise this exchange. For example, next the Brexit vote, U.K. was eager to increase merchandise with Turkey as well as came to encounter Ankara every bit an essential partner inwards stabilising Syrian Arab Republic as well as Iraq. Similarly, the French value their partnership with Turkey on counter-terrorism. During Erdoğan’s see to Paris inwards Jan 2018, French companies signed a few billion euros’ worth of investments with leading Turkish firms. It is easier to create a instance for bilateralism than for accession. For Bulgaria, economical relations with Turkey are important, every bit are attempts to hold Ankara out of Moscow’s orbit. For Greece, efforts to maintain the EU-Turkey refugee bargain as well as proficient relations with Erdoğan are paramount to domestic stability. For Germany, the presence of a large Turkish diaspora creates a human couple betwixt the 2 nations that no politico tin ignore. For Belgium, counter-terrorism cooperation with Turkey is of import inwards containing returning jihadists. The listing of examples is long. When tension around the accession procedure is laid aside, engagement with Turkey appeals to all fellow member states.
This is non to propose that either side terminate the accession process. But since it is frozen as well as Ankara shows no existent commitment to the Copenhagen Criteria (for the moment), Europe as well as Turkey should shift their focus to maintaining a functional relationship. Rather than live on trapped yesteryear the existential interrogation of whether to hold or terminate the accession process, European as well as Turkish leaders should straight their unloosen energy at cooperation inwards areas of mutual involvement – at to the lowest degree for the side yesteryear side few years. In this context, bilateral relations with fellow member states – with an emphasis on unusual policy, counter-terrorism, as well as economical partnership – should assort the novel framework for cooperation.
Such a shift may already live on happening. After a twelvemonth of rising tension with the EU, Ankara’s recent efforts to reset relations with French Republic as well as Federal Republic of Federal Republic of Germany revolve around a new, bilateral agenda – which is divorced from the accession process.[2] Similarly, when Erdoğan travelled to Paris inwards Jan 2018, his starting fourth dimension official see to a western European uppercase for some time, it was non to advance Turkey’s European Union accession bid but to strengthen bilateral economical ties. Equally, although Macron raised diverse human rights issues during talks with the Turkish leader, his principal goal seemed to live on maintaining opened upwards channels of communication with a powerful regional partner rather than to force Turkey towards accession.
TOXIC PUBLIC FEUDS
During the final 2 years, world exchanges betwixt Turkish as well as European leaders receive got ofttimes descended into vitriol as well as resentment. Turkey’s Apr 2017 referendum, every bit good every bit the Dutch as well as High German election that year, led to a novel depression inwards earth discourse on EU-Turkey relations. Turkey’s strongman has called both High German as well as Dutch officials “Nazi remnants” on separate occasions.[3] In 2016, Britain’s Spectator magazine ran a contest featuring a £1,000 prize for rude poesy well-nigh Erdoğan – a prize that went to soon-to-be unusual government minister Boris Johnson. Both the opposition as well as the governing coalition inwards Federal Republic of Federal Republic of Germany receive got questioned whether Turkey nether Erdoğan was lucifer for European Union membership inwards the run-up to the High German election. The High German authorities receive got prevented Erdoğan as well as other Justice as well as Development Party (AKP) leaders from asset bulk election rallies inwards Federal Republic of Federal Republic of Germany for the Turkish diaspora there.[4] In turn, Erdoğan made anti-German as well as anti-European rhetoric the cornerstone of his Apr 2017 plebiscite crusade to expand presidential powers. These mutual recriminations receive got farther eroded world back upwards for Turkey’s accession to the EU. As noted above, elections inwards Turkey as well as European Union countries ofttimes coincide with an escalation inwards hostile rhetoric that, every bit the latter recognise, causes pregnant harm to Turkey’s create inwards the EU.
This verbal state of war of attrition must stop. Fortunately, at that topographic point are signs that it will: inwards Jan 2018, Turkish unusual government minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu as well as Sigmar Gabriel, as well as so High German unusual minister, agreed to resuscitate dialogue betwixt their countries on the status that, with other things, the sides uncovering a ceasefire inwards world feuding. Of course, Turkey as well as Europe volition choke on to criticise each other, but unless this criticism remains within the range of civilised debate, at that topographic point volition live on a farther decline inwards world back upwards for their relationship.
This way Ankara must avoid describing European Union leaders every bit “Nazis” or using other deeply offensive terms. In the run-up to the Apr 2017 referendum, attacks on the European Union became mutual inwards Turkish world discourse every bit the governing AKP worked to secure the nationalist vote. Pro-government media outlets followed AKP officials’ Pb inwards non solely directing harsh criticism at “Europe” inwards full general price but also depicting an alleged pan-European exertion to weaken Turkey as well as its leadership. These tactics both poisoned EU-Turkey relations as well as alienated the sizeable portion of Turkish company that even so harbours pro-European sentiment.
Turkish leaders also demand to displace away from sweeping statements well-nigh a “civilisational clash” with the West – mutual parlance since the 2016 coup attempt. Although Turkey’s Islamist authorities has a smashing involvement inwards playing a leadership role inwards the Middle East, the ground remains component division of the Western alliance every bit a fellow member of NATO as well as the Council of Europe. Turkish policymakers should also live on careful non to equate European Union criticism of Turkey’s human rights tape with back upwards for “terrorism”. Such blanket accusations erode the Turkish public’s trust inwards the European Union as well as wishing for a shared hereafter with Europe. They also perpetuate a dynamic inwards which an inward-looking Turkey sees its Western allies every bit potential enemies eager to “carve up” the country.
Turkey has its ain concerns too. As far every bit AKP officials are concerned, the most pregnant stimulate of tension betwixt Turkey as well as Europe is the latter’s single-minded focus on Erdoğan. Ankara feels compelled to officially react to criticism of Erdoğan to a greater extent than than anything else – fifty-fifty if one-half of Turkish company applauds such criticism. Importantly, the Turkish authorities tends non to distinguish betwixt condemnation of Erdoğan from European officials as well as leaders, as well as that from civil company as well as media outlets. There is an increasing vogue within the Turkish bureaucracy as well as the AKP elite to encounter media outlets as well as civil company groups, including human rights organisations, every bit the hush-hush arm of Western governments. In answering a parliamentary interrogation tabled yesteryear the opposition, Hakan Çavuşoğlu, Turkey’s deputy prime number minister, said inwards Dec 2017, “Media liberty indices are Western-centric as well as the concept of media liberty is Western-centric, non taking into line organisation human relationship the weather of the country.”[5] Erdoğan has warned that Turks who study inwards the West as well as piece of employment for Western companies or institutions willingly choke spies for the West.[6] In diverse speeches, he has defendant Yücel as well as Turkish philanthropist Osman Kavala – whose imprisonment has also caused tilt inwards Europe – of supporting terrorism.
Following the July 2016 coup attempt, the Turkish government’s suspicions well-nigh the West became a daily talking point. Ankara is drifting towards a Russian-style departure from the European Union inwards the debate on values, seeing the advertisement of human rights, costless speech, as well as vibrant civil company every bit an exertion to undercut its sovereignty. In the electrical current climate, the European Union tin do picayune to couple this split upwards with the ruling AKP. Therefore, European leaders should stick to their principles but non personalise disputes with Turkey yesteryear focusing on Erdoğan. Doing otherwise would make a considerable backlash from the authorities of Turkey. Similarly, European leaders as well as European Union officials should seek to explicate to their Turkish counterparts, peculiarly AKP leaders, that Europe’s civil company as well as media receive got a life of their ain as well as are unlikely to defer to the government’s preferences.
As hard to convey every bit it may be, the gap inwards values is a reality for the moment. But Turks as well as Europeans tin even so uncovering mutual ground, especially inwards transactional arrangements. For example, with the recent thaw inwards their relationship, Ankara as well as Berlin receive got made a noticeable exertion to refrain from world criticism of each other – with the latter avoiding comments on Turkey’s human rights record. In turn, Turkish leaders receive got curbed comments that are deeply offensive to Germans. The Germany-bashing inwards Turkey’s pro-government media has ceased completely – the focus having shifted to tensions with the United States, peculiarly Washington’s back upwards for Syrian Kurds, whom Ankara considers to live on terrorists.
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
