Leonid Bershidsky
Facebook is beingness hammered for allowing the information work solid Cambridge Analytica to larn 50 meg user profiles inwards the U.S., which it may or may non guide keep used 1 to aid the Trump campaign. But the scandalise misses the target: There's zilch Cambridge Analytica could guide keep done that Facebook itself doesn't offering political clients. Here, inwards a nutshell, is the CA scandal. In 2014, Aleksandr Kogan, an academic of Russian rootage at Cambridge University inwards the U.K., built a Facebook app that paid hundreds of thousands of users to guide keep a psychological test. Apart from their attempt out results, the users also shared the information of their Facebook friends alongside the app. Kogan sold the resulting database to CA, which Facebook considers a violation of its policies: The app was non allowed to usage the information for commercial purposes. Carol Cadwalladr in addition to Emma Graham-Harrison, writing for the United Kingdom of Great Britain in addition to Northern Ireland of Britain in addition to Northern Republic of Ireland publication Observer, quoted old CA employee Christopher Wylie every bit maxim the work solid "broke Facebook" on behalf of Stephen Bannon, the ideologue in addition to manager behind the Trump campaign. It didn't escape groovy observers that if the Trump get used Facebook user information harvested through an app, it did no to a greater extent than than Barack Obama's 2012 data-heavy re-election campaign. It's non documented just how Obama's squad gathered oodles of information on potential supporters, but a deep dive into the tech side of that get past times Sasha Issenberg mentioned how "'targeted sharing' protocols mined an Obama backer’s Facebook network inwards search of friends the get wanted to register, mobilize, or persuade." To exercise this, the protocols would demand to usage the same characteristic of the Facebook platform for developers, discontinued inwards 2015, that allowed apps access to a user's friends' profiles -- alongside the user's consent, every bit Facebook invariably points out.
Let's confront it: Users are routinely tricked to obtain such consent. Tech companies brand giving it, or agreeing to complex damage of service, await similar a low-engagement decision.
"Is it okay if nosotros await at your friends' info?" they ask.
"Sure, why not? I desire to guide keep this nifty psychological test," nosotros answer.
Afterward, solely Facebook itself is interested inwards the legal minutiae of what permissions it gave to which developers. As far every bit everyone else is concerned, it doesn't thing whether an app gets the information for inquiry purposes or for straight-up political ones. Average users worry to a greater extent than most convenience than privacy.
The relevant question, however, is what a get tin genuinely exercise alongside the data. CA's supposedly sinister science is that it tin usage the Facebook profile information to construct psychological profiles that unwrap a person's propensity to vote for a sure as shooting political party or candidate. When matched against electoral registers, targeted appeals are possible.
But no i should guide keep the psychological profile materials at confront value. No academic piece of work exists to link personality traits, peculiarly those gleaned from the sketchy in addition to oftentimes fake information on Facebook profiles, definitively to political choices. There is, however, research showing that values or fifty-fifty genetic factors trump traits. It's not fifty-fifty clear how traits comport upon political behavior, such every bit the vogue to vote in addition to donate to campaigns: Some researchers, for example, guide keep establish a negative human relationship betwixt emotional stability in addition to these measures; others guide keep establish a positive one.
This is non to tell Facebook data, including information on a user's friends, can't travel useful to campaigns. The Obama get genuinely asked its active supporters to contact half-dozen specific friends suggested past times the algorithm. So 600,000 people reached v meg others, and, according to information from the campaign, twenty per centum of the v meg genuinely did something -- similar registering to vote.
But did the Trump get demand CA in addition to the information it acquired from Kogan to exercise this sort of outreach inwards 2016? Likely not. Facebook cutting off the friends functionality for app developers because it wanted to command its ain offering to clients interested inwards microtargeting.
There's enough of evidence that Brad Parscale, who ran the digital side of Trump's campaign, worked closely alongside Facebook. Using the platform's "Lookalike Audiences," he could discover people who resemble known Trump supporters. Facebook also has the capacity to target ads to the friends of people who guide keep "liked" a page -- a Trump get page, for example.
Targeting messages to millions of specific people without going straight through Facebook is messier in addition to likely to a greater extent than expensive than using the social platform's ain tools. All Facebook requires for access to its information trove is a reasonable fee.
Whether CA could add together anything meaningful to Facebook's endeavor is unclear. Its previous client, the unsuccessful presidential get of Senator Ted Cruz, has said it didn't deliver on all its promises.
Some studies guide keep shown that Facebook ads tin piece of work quite good for businesses. If they also worked for Trump, the CA even out is a cherry-red herring: It's Facebook's ain information collection in addition to the tools it makes available to clients that should travel the target of scrutiny in addition to mayhap regulation, both from a privacy perspective in addition to for the sake of political transparency.
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
