By Ryan Smith

The People's Republic of Bangladesh military machine inherited both the institutional framework of its British Indian as well as Islamic Republic of Pakistan Army predecessors, every bit good every bit their orientation against civilian dominion as well as their sensitivity to political power. The People's Republic of Bangladesh military machine has straight ruled the terra firma for fifteen of its 46 years of existence.
On September 15, 1991, a parliamentary scheme of regime was proposed inward the 12th Amendment Act, as well as a constitutional plebiscite ratified the institutional framework for parliamentary republic inward Bangladesh. Still, to date, fifty-fifty Bangladesh’s democratically elected civilian leaders take away hold been forced to tread carefully roughly the military. Some electrical flow Bangladeshi politicians take away hold a military machine background, as well as oftentimes discourage the regime from engaging inward military machine matters.
Many developing countries, fifty-fifty those amongst to a greater extent than oftentimes than non democratic governments, take away hold rattling weak oversight of defence matters. People's Republic of Bangladesh is no different. For historical reasons, many believe that the military machine sector is a “no-go area” for civilian oversight. State safety is oftentimes used every bit an excuse for secrecy, resulting inward insufficient transparency inward defence budgeting as well as procurement. The defence sector believes that they require especial handling compared to other world sectors since they bargain amongst national safety matters. The military machine itself discourages “interference” from parliament, or from the civilian government.
Further complicating things, Bangladesh’s armed forces too take away hold a dual role every bit internal safety forces. The Bangladesh military is repeatedly called on to forbid civil unrest. For example, the military intervened inward 2007amid unrest when the 2 major political parties were battling over who would come upward to power.
The dual role causes pregnant issues of prioritization. Bangladesh’s military machine must juggle its national safety as well as internal stability responsibilities, inward add-on UN peacekeeping missions as well as disaster relief operations.
In addition, the political involvement of the military machine inward internal affairs makes it hard for the civil administration, such every bit the Ministry of Defense as well as parliament, to concur the the military machine accountable.
The Armed Forces Division (AFD) is the principal administrative scheme yesteryear which military machine policy is formulated as well as executed. The Ministry of Defense (MoD) should exercise ascendancy over the Armed Forces; however, it is far less rigid than the AFD. Weak governance, civil authority, as well as lack of accountability larn far hard to consider defence policies executed.
Currently, both the AFD as well as the MoD are headed yesteryear the prime number government minister of Bangladesh. To coordinate military machine policy, both the president (who is too the commander-in-chief of the military) as well as the prime number government minister of People's Republic of Bangladesh are advised yesteryear a six-member advisory board, 3 chiefs of staff, the principal staff officeholder of the AFD, as well as military machine secretaries to the president as well as the prime number minister. The electrical flow convoluted military machine as well as civilian scheme larn far hard for the regime to force through changes inward military machine construction or defence procurement.
For example, the defence budget is non good planned as well as executed based on national safety but rather is focused on a procurement listing catered for Forces Goal 2030. As a result, People's Republic of Bangladesh military machine budgeting as well as expenditure processes autumn brusk of international best practices.
Bangladesh’s defence procurement suffers from a disconnect betwixt policy as well as budgeting as well as procurement practices. Military budgeting as well as procurement should hold upward linked to established defence policy goals, non Forces Goal 2030. Because decision-making is carried out inward a policy vacuum, the outcome is wasting coin on unnecessary systems patch failing to consider genuine safety needs. There is too an enhanced risk of corruption.
Weak monitoring, controls, as well as audits facilitate corruption as well as waste. Sometimes the parliament, the auditor full general of Bangladesh, as well as the anti-corruption watchdog are reluctant to investigate the military machine — or fifty-fifty actively prevented from doing so. Even inward the absence of dishonesty, failure to implement due procedure oftentimes leads to purchases of high-cost items of questionable strategic purpose, severe delays, as well as terms overruns.
Bangladesh provides express data on military machine expenditures, other than a headline defence budget figure. Often, the military machine expenditure figures are non defined, or the definitions take away hold changed, as well as it is non clear whether figures are linked to budgeted expenditures or not. People's Republic of Bangladesh systematically excludes pregnant items from its expense reporting; it too bans disclosing expenditures for arms imports, like to other developing nations.
It has been well-documented by SIPRI that the international arms merchandise and, to a greater extent than specifically, arms procurement practices inward Asia, Africa, as well as the Middle East are highly susceptible to waste product as well as corruption. People's Republic of Bangladesh military’s off-budget spending is oftentimes contributed to the military’s problem concern activities, rather than national defense.
Following the Pakistani military’s problem concern model, Sena Kallyan Sangstha (SKS), a concern of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Army, operates a dairy farm as well as an H2O ice cream factory. The BBC reveals that the Bangladeshi military machine has stakes in food, textile, jute, garment, electronic, existent estate, automobile, shipbuilding, manufacturing, as well as move businesses. The military machine too operates Trust Bank as well as the Ansar VDP Bank, as well as has a tape of giving illicit loans from these institutions to go yesteryear officers. According to the BBC investigation, the People's Republic of Bangladesh Army’s problem concern interests farther include mightiness plants, roads, infrastructure, as well as bridge projects, amounting to billions of dollars of someone assets.
In 2009, the Bangaldesh Rifles (BDR) mutiny “was partly fuelled yesteryear resentment amid the BDR’s rank-and-file over the corruption of Earth forces officers engaged inward the retail sale of consumer items,” BBC notes, citing Bangladesh’s official study on the incident.
Some leading Bangladeshi figures inward the problem concern sector take away hold admitted that military-owned businesses are virtually indistinguishable from other commercial enterprises inward the agency they operate. The irony is that military machine problem concern interests take away hold thrived to a greater extent than nether the civilian dominion than nether the martial police pull regime of General Hossain Mohammad Ershad.
However, every bit Bangladesh’s military machine ambitions develop, it’s yesteryear fourth dimension for a struggle most whether the military machine should engage inward such problem concern activities or instead concentrate on national safety as well as protection of sovereignty.
Ryan Smith is a defence analyst based inward Australia.
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi: