By Sue Halpern
Christopher Wylie, formerly of Cambridge Analytica, has explained how the fellowship used Facebook information to advance Donald Trump’s campaign.What are nosotros to brand of the revelations published over the weekend, inward the Observer too the Times, that Cambridge Analytica, the data-analytics too messaging fellowship financed, inward part, past times the conservative billionaire Robert Mercer, used tens of millions of ill-gotten Facebook profiles to create algorithms aimed at “breaking” American democracy? First, that these were non actually revelations at all. Reporters from the Guardian, The New Yorker, The New York Review of Books, Das Magazin, too the Intercept guide hold been reporting these facts for years. We knew as early equally December, 2015, for instance, that Facebook information obtained without users’ noesis was beingness exploited past times Cambridge Analytica on behalf of Senator Ted Cruz, who at that fourth dimension was Mercer’s preferred candidate inward the Republican Presidential primaries. Later, when the Mercer family, along alongside Steve Bannon, came to back upwardly Donald Trump, it was no hugger-mugger that they brought alongside them Cambridge Analytica, a occupation solid that boasted of beingness able to parse too influence the electorate through “psychographic” algorithms derived from that data. After Trump won, Alexander Nix, the caput of Cambridge Analytica, crowed that the company’s psychographic algorithms had carried the day. (He afterwards retracted that, too then reaffirmed it.)
The millions of Facebook accounts inward question—as the reporter Mattathias Schwartz pointed out in conclusion March—were to a greater extent than oft than non culled from the friend networks of people who clicked on a cute personality quiz on the site. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 important issue of the initial exam takers, starting inward around 2014, were paid freelancers recruited through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk marketplace past times a British inquiry fellowship called GSR. They too others who took the quiz probable did non know that they were giving GSR permission to access their Facebook friends’ profiles. If Facebook officials were non aware of this at the time, when GSR sold this information to Cambridge Analytica, they sure as shooting knew it past times January, 2017, when the Swiss researchers Hannes Grassegger too Mikael Krogerus published “The Data That Turned the World Upside Down,” a detailed occupation organisation human relationship of how C.A.’s psychological modelling was used past times the Trump campaign. (The Guardianrecently quoted a onetime Facebook employee inward accuse of information safety explaining that he “always assumed in that location was something of a dark market” for information obtained past times third-party companies such equally GSR, too that when he brought this upwardly to his bosses he was discouraged from investigating also deeply. “Do you lot actually desire to encounter what you’ll find?” he says a Facebook executive told him.)
When Facebook finally acknowledged that Cambridge Analytica was using Facebook information it had obtained surreptitiously, the company’s reply was non to warning its users or audit its partners or engage inward whatever classify of meaningful reform. Rather, it sent a polite asking to Cambridge Analytica asking it to delete the GSR-sourced material, some of which, according to the Times,remains on the company’s servers.
This weekend’s reports virtually Facebook too Cambridge Analytica did innovate us to Christopher Wylie, a twenty-eight-year-old Canadian coder too information scientist, who conceived too helped build C.A.’s psychographic tools. For at to the lowest degree a year, it seems, Wylie had been feeding information to Carole Cadwalladr too her squad at the Guardian too its sis paper, the Observer. Now he is out of the shadows. In a thirteen-minute video posted on the Guardian’s Web site on Saturday, Wylie details the even of the creation too deployment of “the weapon” that he too Nix sold to Bannon, too and then to Mercer, to create out their “culture war.” It was inward those early on days of 2014, Wylie says, that he too Bannon began testing slogans similar “drain the swamp” too “the deep state” too “build the wall,” too institute a surprising issue of Americans who responded strongly to them. All they needed was a candidate to parrot them. Cambridge Analytica promised that psychographics could non solely target people equally voters but also equally personalities. “We would know what form of messaging you’d hold upwardly susceptible to too where you lot are going to swallow it too how many times nosotros are going to guide hold to impact you lot alongside it to alter how you lot recall virtually something,” Wylie told the Guardian. “Web sites volition hold upwardly created. Blogs volition hold upwardly created—whatever nosotros recall this target profile volition hold upwardly receptive to. See it, click it, too choke downward the rabbit hole until they start to recall something different.” The destination was to pause society. “It is solely when you lot pause it tin you lot remodel the pieces into your vision of a novel society.” As 1 onetime executive of Mercer’s hedge fund told The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, in conclusion year, “He wants it to all autumn down.”
Perhaps the most telling revelation from the recent reporting—aside from the U.K.’s Channel iv catching Alexander Nix on photographic idiot box camera explaining how his fellowship could render beautiful Ukrainian women to entrap politicians—is that Cambridge Analytica is essentially a trounce fellowship created past times the British occupation solid Strategic Communications Laboratories. During the 2016 campaign, according to Cadwalladr, C.A. was staffed primarily past times non-U.S. citizens, inward possible violation of American campaign-finance laws. This included the contractors the occupation solid brought to Austin, Texas, to go alongside Trump’s digital squad there.
“We were actually speaking straight to the voters inward a issue of states,” 1 onetime C.A. employee, who worked alongside a issue of non-U.S. citizens or green-card holders, told the Guardian. Cadwalladr writes, “It is understood that some were working on tourist visas. Another ex-employee claimed that they had been provided alongside letters to give to US border command officials where needed, stating that they would non hold upwardly working” inward the United States. And, she points out, Bannon, Nix, too Rebekah Mercer (Robert’s daughter) knew that this was illegal. Their counsel, who happened to go at Rudolph Giuliani’s constabulary firm, permit them know inward a memo written inward July, 2014.
These Cambridge Analytica contractors worked alongside Trump’s digital team, headed past times Brad Parscale too Jared Kushner. Alongside all of them were Facebook employees who were embedded alongside the Trump motility to aid them occupation Facebook’s diverse tools most effectively—including the so-called “dark posts,” used to dissuade African-Americans from showing upwardly to vote. Did whatever of them know that the information that Cambridge Analytica was using to target voters, arts and crafts ads too weblog posts, too create upwardly one's hear Trump’s go schedule came from millions of American Facebook members whose information had been taken without consent too sold for a 1 one m thousand dollars—what Cadwalladr is calling a massive information “breach”? Maybe, or maybe not—and it hardly matters. For to a greater extent than than a year, Cadwalladr has done yeoman work, reporting on the nihilism of Bannon too the Mercers, the cravenness of Nix, too connecting the dots betwixt them too Trump too Facebook. But those millions of Facebook profiles create non inward fact constitute a breach: they were obtained legally. Nobody hacked Facebook—nor would they guide hold had to—because the occupation organisation model of Facebook is predicated on mining the personal details of its 2 billion users. In a statement on Wednesday, Mark Zuckerberg could solely chalk the whole saga upwardly to “a breach of trust betwixt Kogan, Cambridge Analytica too Facebook.” The fellowship is aided inward maintaining this seat past times privacy policies that are equally obscure equally they are lax. As a consequence, Facebook created the weather for millions of Americans to choke unwitting cogs inward the essay to teach Trump elected.
Christopher Wylie knew all this, too he watched what he instantly calls his “grossly unethical experiment” unfold inward existent time. It is, he says, “something that I regret.” So instantly he’s blown the whistle and, inward turn, Facebook has suspended his account. The fellowship may guide hold shot the messenger, but, fifty-fifty so, his message has been heard loud too clear, inward Parliament (where Nix, who has instantly been suspended past times Cambridge Analytica, volition hold upwardly called dorsum to explicate what seem to hold upwardly the lies he told in that location in conclusion month, during hearings on faux news), inward Congress (where Nix too maybe Zuckerberg volition also hold upwardly called to account), on the forepart page of newspapers around the world, too on Twitter (where the hashtags “Where’s Zuck?” too “DeleteFacebook” guide hold been trending). Wylie’s words guide hold also reverberated on Wall Street, where, inward the commencement 2 hours of trading after his video confession (and the tidings that he had supplied e-mails too documents to American too British authorities), Facebook stock lost xxx billion dollars inward value. It is instantly downward past times 60 billion dollars. It would non hold upwardly incorrect to telephone outcry upwardly this payback.
This article has been updated to correctly seat the Intercept reporter who wrote the March, 2017, article.
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
